150 S.W.2d 239 (Tex.Com.App. 1941), 1851-7597, Morton v. Burton-Lingo Co.

Citation: 150 S.W.2d 239, 136 Tex. 263

Opinion Judge: SLATTON, Commissioner.

Party Name: MORTON et al. v. BURTON-LINGO CO.

Attorney: [136 Tex. 264] Scarborough & Ely and Edmund Yates, all of Abilene, for plaintiffs in error. [136 Tex. 265] Smith & Eplen, of Abilene, and George Faust, Horace E. Moore, and Cummings & Johnson, all of Fort Worth, for defendant in error.

Case Date: April 09, 1941

Court: Court of Commission of Appeals of Texas

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

150 S.W.2d 239 (Tex.Com.App. 1941), 1851-7597, Morton v. Burton-Lingo Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Texas - 13 S.W. 174 (Tex. 1890), Meyer v. Opperman
Texas - 16 S.W. 628 (Tex. 1891), O'Connor v. Andrews
Texas - 289 S.W. 196 (Tex.Civ.App. 1926), 438, Churchwell v. Pure Oil Pipe Line Co.
Texas - 108 S.W.2d 947 (Tex.Civ.App. 1937), 10109, F. H. Vahlsing, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.
Texas - 126 S.W.2d 727 (Tex.Civ.App. 1939), 1880, Burton-Lingo Co., Inc. v. Morton