15 S.E.2d 662 (S.C. 1941), 15290, Hamilton v. Little

Citation: 15 S.E.2d 662, 197 S.C. 434

Opinion Judge: The opinion of the Court was delivered by MR. ASSOCIATE JUSTICE BAKER.

Party Name: HAMILTON v. LITTLE et al.

Attorney: Mr. G. Lloyd Ford, of Conway, for appellant, cites: As to sufficiency of evidence to sustain finding of the Industrial Commission: 185 S. C., 497; 194 S. E., 447; 186 S. C., 374; 195 S. E., 646; 188 S. C., 364; 199 S. E., 412; 188 S. C., 393; 199 S. E., 530; 189 S. C., 188; 200 S. C., 727; 190 S....

Case Date: July 07, 1941

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

15 S.E.2d 662 (S.C. 1941), 15290, Hamilton v. Little

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 194 S.E. 447 (S.C. 1937), 14588, Murdaugh v. Robert Lee Const. Co.
South Carolina - 10 S.E.2d 164 (S.C. 1940), 15138, Burnette v. Startex Mills
South Carolina - 6 S.E.2d 256 (S.C. 1939), 14985, Manning v. Gossett Mills
South Carolina - 6 S.E.2d 761 (S.C. 1940), 14999, Poole v. Saxon Mills
South Carolina - 7 S.E.2d 1 (S.C. 1940), 15006, Johnston v. Sam E. Finley Const. Co.

See all quotations