149 S.E.2d 111 (Ga. 1966), 23421, Bacon v. State

Citation: 149 S.E.2d 111, 222 Ga. 151

Opinion Judge: QUILLIAN, Justice.

Party Name: David BACON v. The STATE.

Attorney: 3. The charge in the present case on the subject of corroboration was not susceptible to the criticism made in the argument of counsel that it was garbled and confusing., David Bacon appeals to this court from his conviction of murder and sentence to life imprisonment in Bibb Superior Court., tes...

Case Date: Friday May 06, 1966

Court: Georgia Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

149 S.E.2d 111 (Ga. 1966), 23421, Bacon v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 109 S.E. 291 (Ga. 1921), 2686, Bonner v. State
Georgia - 111 S.E. 545 (Ga. 1922), 2944, Connell v. State
Georgia - 168 S.E. 278 (Ga. 1933), 8864, Hatcher v. State
Georgia - 65 S.E. 1064 (Ga.App. 1909), 2,011, Herrington & Co. v. Shumate Razor Co.
Georgia - 106 S.E.2d 332 (Ga.App. 1958), 37229, Gordy Tire Co. v. Bulman

See all quotations