149 Cal.App.4th 1089, C050066, County of Amador v. City of Plymouth

Citation: 149 Cal.App.4th 1089, __ Cal.Rptr.3d __

Opinion Judge: [10] The opinion of the court was delivered by: Blease, Acting P.J.

Party Name: County of Amador v. City of Plymouth

Attorney: [7] Holland & Knight, Paul C. Workman, Zehava Zevit and Amanda J. Monchamp for Intervenor and Appellant. [8] John F. Hahn, County Counsel, Martha Jeanne Shaver, Assistant County Counsel, and Gregory Gillott, Deputy County Counsel; Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor and James R. Parr...

Case Date: April 17, 2007

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

149 Cal.App.4th 1089, C050066, County of Amador v. City of Plymouth

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 61 Cal.2d 318, 27756, Keene v. Harling
California - 47 Cal.3d 376, S001922, Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California
California - 8 Cal.3d 247, 7924, Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors
California - 16 Cal.4th 105, S053508, Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game Com.
California - 117 Cal.App.2d 167, 19240, City of Los Angeles v. Fiske

See all quotations