148 A.2d 58 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1959), Kryscnski v. Shenkin

Citation: 148 A.2d 58, 53 N.J.Super. 590

Opinion Judge: [9] Goldmann

Party Name: Lottie KRYSCNSKI and William Kryscnski, her husband, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Stanley SHENKIN, Building Inspector of the Township of Washington, a municipal corporation, and Board of Adjustment of the Township of Washington, Defendants-Appellants.

Attorney: [6] Mr. Lloyd L. Schroeder argued the cause for appellants.

Case Date: Thursday January 29, 1959

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

148 A.2d 58 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1959), Kryscnski v. Shenkin

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Jersey - 125 A.2d 543 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1956), No. A--572, Ardolino v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Florham Park
New Jersey - 126 A.2d 660 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1956), No. A--535, Borough of Paramus v. Block 1527
New Jersey - 130 A.2d 847 (N.J. 1957), A-104, Ardolino v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Florham Park
New Jersey - 145 A.2d 790 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1958), A--645, Burke v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Spring Lake
New Jersey - 148 A.2d 47 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1959), A--692, Portage Shoe Mfg. Co. v. Reich

See all quotations