147 N.W. 1046 (Wis. 1914), Bonnell v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co.
Citation:
147 N.W. 1046, 158 Wis. 153
Opinion Judge:
TIMLIN, J.
Party Name:
BONNELL, Respondent, v. CHICAGO, ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & OMAHA RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant. SAME, Appellant v. SAME, Respondent
Attorney:
For the defendant there was a brief by R. L. Kennedy and Luse, Powell & Luse, attorneys, and James B. Sheean, of counsel, and oral argument by Mr. L. K. Luse and Mr. Kennedy. W. R. Foley and W. M. Steele, for the plaintiff.
Judge Panel:
WILLIAM H. TIMLIN, J. JOHN B. WINSLOW, C. J., JOHN BARNES and AAD J. VINJE, JJ., dissented. BARNES; WINSLOW BARNES, J. I dissent. I hold: (1) That the order setting aside the first verdict and granting a new trial was reviewable on an appeal from the judgment rendered on the second verdict under ...
