147 Cal.App.3d 906, 6990, Ames v. Board of Retirement

Citation: 147 Cal.App.3d 906, 195 Cal.Rptr. 453

Opinion Judge: [10] Zenovich

Party Name: Ames v. Board of Retirement

Attorney: [7] Ferrari, Cole & Tusan and Thomas J. Tusan for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Thomas D. Bowman, County Counsel, Lita O'Neill Blatner, Assistant County Counsel, Steven B. Bassoff, Kathleen Bales-Lange and Roger B. Coffman, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: Friday October 07, 1983

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

147 Cal.App.3d 906, 6990, Ames v. Board of Retirement

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 219 Cal. 699, L. A. 14308, Ethel D. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Commission of California
California - 32 Cal.2d 301, 20515, Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners
California - 55 Cal.2d 11, 7090, Neal v. State
California - 61 Cal.2d 93, 21455, Griggs v. Board of Trustees of Merced Union H. S. Dist.
California - 4 Cal.3d 130, 29689, Bixby v. Pierno

See all quotations