147 Cal.App.2d 28, 16989, Hagen v. Sherman

Citation: 147 Cal.App.2d 28, 304 P.2d 767

Opinion Judge: [10] Bray

Party Name: Hagen v. Sherman

Attorney: [7] Smith & Parrish and Edwin A. Clancy, Jr., for Appellant. [8] Barbagelata, Zief & Carmazzi, Robert D. Barbagelata and Rinaldo A. Carmazzi for Respondent.

Case Date: Tuesday December 18, 1956

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

147 Cal.App.2d 28, 16989, Hagen v. Sherman

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 92 Cal. 528, 12623, Spring Valley Water Works v. Drinkhouse
California - 37 Cal.2d 34, 5136, People v. Newson
California - 37 Cal.2d 696, 21472, M. F. Kemper Const. Co. v. City of L. A.
California - 107 Cal.App.2d 718, 18368, Schultz v. Los Angeles Dons, Inc.
California - 113 Cal.App.2d 295, 8133, Bassett v. Crisp

See all quotations