146 S.E.2d 636 (Ga. 1966), 23199, Schuster v. Schuster

Citation: 146 S.E.2d 636, 221 Ga. 614

Opinion Judge: MOBLEY, Justice.

Party Name: Edvige J. SCHUSTER v. Raymond H. SCHUSTER.

Attorney: As there was some evidence, though slight, showing a substantial change in plaintiff's ability to pay alimony as originally decreed, the trial court did not err in overruling appellant's motion for new trial on the general grounds., Lester & Lester, James L. Lester, Augusta, for appellant., Thurm...

Case Date: Thursday January 06, 1966

Court: Georgia Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

146 S.E.2d 636 (Ga. 1966), 23199, Schuster v. Schuster

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 100 S.E.2d 179 (Ga. 1957), 19783, Shaw v. Miller
Georgia - 100 S.E.2d 431 (Ga. 1957), 19849, Welch v. Welch
Georgia - 102 S.E.2d 534 (Ga. 1958), 19941, Perry v. Perry
Georgia - 128 S.E.2d 496 (Ga. 1962), 21797, Kendrick v. Kendrick
Georgia - 146 S.E.2d 640 (Ga. 1966), 23203, Pruitt v. Housley

See all quotations