146 N.W. 812 (Wis. 1914), Van Dyke v. City of Milwaukee

Citation: 146 N.W. 812, 159 Wis. 460

Opinion Judge: VINJE, J.

Party Name: VAN DYKE, Respondent, v. CITY OF MILWAUKEE, Appellant

Attorney: For the appellant there was a brief by Daniel W. Hoan, city attorney, and Garfield S. Canright, assistant city attorney, and oral argument by Mr. Canright. Geo. D. Van Dyke, respondent, in pro. per., contended, inter alia, that a mine is a capital asset, and sales of ore therefrom are not income ...

Judge Panel: AAD J. VINJE, J. JOHN BARNES, J., dissented. WINSLOW, C. J., and SIEBECKER, J., dissent.

Case Date: Thursday April 09, 1914

Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court