144 S.E.2d 485 (S.C. 1965), 18400, Miller v. Rogers
Citation:
144 S.E.2d 485, 246 S.C. 438
Opinion Judge:
BUSSEY, Justice.
Party Name:
Edward W. MILLER, Rogers Miller and Mary Miller, Appellants, v. Charles W. ROGERS, Elizabeth R. Airth, Neva R. Radford, Winston J. Rogers, Lena R. Hall, J. D. Garden, Olive Gandy Rogers, William W. Rogers, Ralph F. Rogers, Louise V. Rogers and Elizabeth R. Ingram, Respondents.
Attorney:
Messrs. Tison & Tison, of Bennettsville, and Robinson, McFadden & Moore, of Columbia, for Appellants, cite: As to the cardinal rule of construing the provisions of a will being to ascertain the intention of the testator: 229 S.C. 500, 93 S.E.2d 918; 233 S.C. 110, 103 S.E.2d 769; 221 S.C. 360, 70 ...
