144 N.W. 955 (Minn. 1913), 18,288, Schultz v. City of St. Paul

Citation: 144 N.W. 955, 124 Minn. 257

Opinion Judge: DIBELL, C.

Party Name: BEN SCHULTZ v. CITY OF ST. PAUL

Attorney: Barton & Kay, for appellant. O. H. O'Neill, Corporation Attorney, John A. Burns and William J. Giberson, Assistant Corporation Attorneys, for respondent.

Case Date: Thursday January 09, 1913

Court: Minnesota Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

144 N.W. 955 (Minn. 1913), 18,288, Schultz v. City of St. Paul

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Minnesota - 101 N.W. 949 (Minn. 1904), 14,078, Swanson v. Oakes
Minnesota - 107 N.W. 739 (Minn. 1906), 14,650, Costello v. Frankman
Minnesota - 116 N.W. 918 (Minn. 1908), 15,536, King v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
Minnesota - 137 N.W. 199 (Minn. 1912), 17,577, Gaughan v. City of St. Paul
Minnesota - 88 N.W. 436 (Minn. 1901), 12,857, Attix v. Minnesota Sandstone Company