143 S.W.2d 138 (Tex.Civ.App. 1940), 9444, Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Midas Oil Co.

Citation: 143 S.W.2d 138

Opinion Judge: BAUGH, Justice.

Party Name: STANOLIND OIL & GAS CO. v. MIDAS OIL CO. ET AL. No. 9016;

Attorney: Turner, Rodgers & Winn, W. W. Prior, Jr., and Frank J. Scurlock, all of Dallas (Donald Campbell, of Tulsa, Okl., of counsel), for appellant. Gerald C. Mann, Atty. Gen., and Edgar Cale, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee Railroad Commission of Texas. Carl W. Wade, of Dallas, and Wheeler & Wheeler, of ...

Case Date: Wednesday July 03, 1940

Court: Texas Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

143 S.W.2d 138 (Tex.Civ.App. 1940), 9444, Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Midas Oil Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Texas - 123 S.W.2d 911 (Tex.Civ.App. 1938), 8635, Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Midas Oil Co.
Texas - 131 S.W.2d 73 (Tex. 1939), 7521, Gulf Land Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.
Texas - 139 S.W.2d 314 (Tex.Civ.App. 1940), 8980, General American Oil Co. of Texas v. Gulf Oil Corp.
Texas - 143 S.W.2d 135 (Tex.Civ.App. 1940), 9006, Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Potter