143 S.E.2d 722 (S.C. 1965), 18392, Johnson v. Finney

Citation: 143 S.E.2d 722, 246 S.C. 366

Opinion Judge: MOSS, Justice.

Party Name: Harold JOHNSON, Respondent, v. Claude S. FINNEY, Claude S. Flnney, Jr., and Dickerson, Inc., of which Claude S. Finney and Claude S. Finney, Jr., are, Appellants.

Attorney: Messrs. Smith & Moore and Arthur M. Flowers, Jr., of Georgetown, for Appellants, cite: As to error on part of Trial Judge in failing to grant Appellants' timely motions for nonsuit and direction of verdict since the testimony clearly shows that the Respondent was guilty of contributory negligence...

Case Date: August 19, 1965

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

143 S.E.2d 722 (S.C. 1965), 18392, Johnson v. Finney

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 118 S.E.2d 692 (S.C. 1961), 17749, West v. Sowell
South Carolina - 64 S.E.2d 253 (S.C. 1951), 16478, Mize v. Blue Ridge Ry. Co.
South Carolina - 88 S.E.2d 780 (S.C. 1955), 17055, Smith v. Canal Ins. Co.
Connecticut - 11 A.2d 354 (Conn. 1940), Minacci v. Logudice