143 S.E.2d 607 (S.C. 1965), 18387, Parrott v. Plowden Motor Co.

Citation: 143 S.E.2d 607, 246 S.C. 318

Opinion Judge: TAYLOR, Chief Justice.

Party Name: Ashton PARROTT, Respondent, v. PLOWDEN MOTOR COMPANY, Appellant.

Attorney: Messrs. Wright, Scott, Blackwell & Powers, of Florence, for Appellant, cite: As to elements necessary in an action for malicious prosecution: 54 C. J. S. 955; 34 Am. Jur. 706; Vol. 3, Re-statement of the Law 382, Sec. 653. As to proof of malice in fact being essential to the maintenance of an act...

Case Date: August 04, 1965

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

143 S.E.2d 607 (S.C. 1965), 18387, Parrott v. Plowden Motor Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 16 S.C. 387 (S.C. 1882), CASE 1134, Hogg v. Pinckney
South Carolina - 9 S.E. 1027 (S.C. 1889), Stoddard v. Roland
South Carolina - 92 S.E. 335 (S.C. 1917), 7672, China v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.
South Carolina - 122 S.E.2d 417 (S.C. 1961), 17843, Margolis v. Telech
South Carolina - 141 S.E.2d 342 (S.C. 1965), 18327, Prosser v. Parsons

See all quotations