143 S.E.2d 521 (S.C. 1965), 18380, Chaney v. Burgess

Citation: 143 S.E.2d 521, 246 S.C. 261

Opinion Judge: LEWIS, Justice.

Party Name: Grover T. CHANEY, Appellant, v. William F. BURGESS, Respondent.

Attorney: Messrs. Henry Hammer and Isadore S. Bernstein, of Columbia, and Toole & Toole, of Aiken, for Appellant, cite: As to on motion for nonsuit the evidence, and the inferences to be drawn therefrom, must be viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party: 242 S.C. 221, 131 S.E.2d 486; 240 S...

Case Date: Monday July 19, 1965

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

143 S.E.2d 521 (S.C. 1965), 18380, Chaney v. Burgess

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 257 F.2d 694 (4th Cir. 1958), 7666, Ferguson v. Smith
South Carolina - 137 S.E.2d 591 (S.C. 1964), 18249, Lawless v. Fraser
South Carolina - 32 S.E.2d 368 (S.C. 1944), 15695, Mahon v. Spartanburg County
South Carolina - 7 S.E.2d 459 (S.C. 1940), 15017, Leek v. New South Express Lines
South Carolina - 80 S.E.2d 748 (S.C. 1954), 16843, Barnwell v. Elliott