143 A. 900 (Conn. 1928), Di Francesco v. Moomjian

Citation: 143 A. 900, 108 Conn. 515

Opinion Judge: HAINES, J.

Party Name: DI FRANCESCO v. MOOMJIAN ET AL.

Attorney: Charles S. Hamilton, of New Haven, for appellant Mary H. Moomjian. Benjamin F. Goldman and James A. Morcaldi, both of New Haven, for appellee.

Judge Panel: Argued before WHEELER, C.J., and MALTBIE, HAINES, HINMAN, and BANKS, JJ.

Case Date: Tuesday December 18, 1928

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

143 A. 900 (Conn. 1928), Di Francesco v. Moomjian

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 11 A. 854 (Conn. 1887), Scutt v. Town of Southbury
Connecticut - 130 A. 576 (Conn. 1925), Liefeld v. Coffin
Connecticut - 22 A. 1094 (Conn. 1891), McElligott v. Randolph
Connecticut - 35 A. 772 (Conn. 1896), Perkins v. Town of Colebrook
Connecticut - 67 A. 891 (Conn. 1907), Appeal of Gray