142 Cal.App.4th 1313, A108972, Koehl v. Verio, Inc.

Citation: 142 Cal.App.4th 1313

Opinion Judge: [9] The opinion of the court was delivered by: Richman, J.

Party Name: Koehl v. Verio, Inc.

Attorney: [7] Attorney for Appellants: Thierman Law Firm, Mark R. Thierman; Hoffman & Lazear, Plaintiffs and H. Tim Hoffman and Arthur Lazear [8] Attorneys for Defendants and Respondents: Hale Friesen, Shannon M. Henderson and Daniel E. Friesen, pro hac vice

Case Date: September 13, 2006

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

142 Cal.App.4th 1313, A108972, Koehl v. Verio, Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 335 F.2d 759 (2nd Cir. 1964), 364, Entis v. Atlantic Wire & Cable Corp.
California - 218 Cal. 233, S. F. 14397, Ernst v. Searle
California - 3 Cal.2d 427, 15280, Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.
California - 55 Cal.2d 203, 26046, Reid v. Overland Machined Products
California - 57 Cal.2d 319, 20617, Kerr's Catering Service v. Department of Indus. Relations

See all quotations