142 Cal.App.2d 502, 16804, Kaukonen v. Aro

Citation: 142 Cal.App.2d 502, 298 P.2d 611

Opinion Judge: [9] The Court

Party Name: Kaukonen v. Aro

Attorney: [7] Bledsoe, Smith, Cathcart & Phelps, Leighton M. Bledsoe and J. Barton Phelps for Appellant. [8] Ropers & Majeski, Harold Ropers, Campbell, Custer, Warburton & Britton, Austen D. Warburton and W. R. Dunn for Respondent.

Case Date: Monday June 25, 1956

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

142 Cal.App.2d 502, 16804, Kaukonen v. Aro

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 58 Cal. 382, 7,493, Emmerson v. Weeks
California - 40 Cal.2d 669, 18646, Brooks v. E. J. Willig Truck Transp. Co.
California - 5 Cal.2d 257, 15389, Wrightson v. Dougherty
California - 5 Cal.2d 545, 14610, Southern Pacific Co. v. City of Los Angeles
California - 6 Cal.2d 123, 15516, Tognazzi v. Wilhelm

See all quotations