14 Cal.App.3d 530, 12594, Halpin v. Superior Court

Citation: 14 Cal.App.3d 530, 92 Cal.Rptr. 329

Opinion Judge: [10] Pierce

Party Name: Halpin v. Superior Court

Attorney: [6] Fitzwilliam, Memering, Stumbos & DeMers, Louis A. DeMers, Bledsoe, Smith, Cathcart, Johnson & Rogers and Roger Smith for Petitioners and for Real Parties in Interest in No. 12606. [7] No appearance for Respondent. [8] Rust & Mills, Horvitz & Minikes, Ellis J. Horvitz and William Mayhew for Re...

Case Date: Wednesday January 20, 1971

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

14 Cal.App.3d 530, 12594, Halpin v. Superior Court

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 191 Cal.App.2d 554, 6683, Cade v. Superior Court In and For San Bernardino County
California - 209 Cal.App.2d 542, 26084, Thornton v. Luce
California - 23 Cal.App.2d 173, 2042, Gorman v. Superior Court
California - 244 Cal.App.2d 696, 22438, Stearns v. Los Angeles City School Dist.
California - 75 Cal.App.2d 925, 7271, Myers v. Superior Court

See all quotations