14 Cal.4th 394, S050952, Rosenthal v. Great Western Fin. Securities Corp.

Citation: 14 Cal.4th 394, 58 Cal.Rptr.2d 875, 926 P.2d 1061

Opinion Judge: [12] The opinion of the court was delivered by: Werdegar

Party Name: Rosenthal v. Great Western Fin. Securities Corp.

Attorney: [7] Morrison & Foerster, Shirley M. Hufstedler, Maren E. Nelson and David K. Barrett for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Michael B. Dashjian, Steven Drapkin, Lee W. Rierson, Proskauer, Rose, Goetz & Mendelsohn, Jeffrey A. Berman, Daniel E. Eaton, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker and Paul Grossman...

Case Date: December 12, 1996

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

14 Cal.4th 394, S050952, Rosenthal v. Great Western Fin. Securities Corp.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

US Code - 9 U.S.C. § 1 "Maritime Transactions" and "Commerce" Defined; Exceptions to Operation of Title
US Code - 9 U.S.C. § 2 Validity, Irrevocability, and Enforcement of Agreements to Arbitrate
US Code - 9 U.S.C. § 3 Stay of Proceedings Where Issue Therein Referable to Arbitration
US Code - 9 U.S.C. § 4 Failure to Arbitrate Under Agreement; Petition to United States Court Having Jurisdiction For Order to Compel Arbitration; Notice and Service Thereof; Hearing and Determination
US Code - 9 U.S.C. § 5 Appointment of Arbitrators Or Umpire

See all quotations