139 S.E.2d 461 (Ga.App. 1964), 40815, Cagle Poultry & Egg Co. v. Busick

Citation: 139 S.E.2d 461, 110 Ga.App. 551

Party Name: CAGLE POULTRY & EGG COMPANY et al. v. Paul BUSICK.

Attorney: (b) Photographs tending to show a relevant and material fact are not subject to an objection that their admission in evidence would prejudice and inflame the minds of the jurors., (c) It does not constitute reversible error for a trial court to admit in evidence on the trial of a case more than o...

Case Date: October 27, 1964

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

139 S.E.2d 461 (Ga.App. 1964), 40815, Cagle Poultry & Egg Co. v. Busick

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 69 Ga. 36 (Ga. 1882), Franklin v. State
Georgia - 115 S.E.2d 842 (Ga.App. 1960), 38121, Myers v. Pearce
Georgia - 122 S.E.2d 149 (Ga.App. 1961), 38891, Hunt v. Williams
Georgia - 125 S.E.2d 713 (Ga.App. 1962), 39323, Porter v. Bland
Georgia - 129 S.E.2d 362 (Ga.App. 1962), 39737, Whaley v. Sim Grady Machinery Co.

See all quotations