139 Cal.App.2d 78, 20721, Mast v. State Board of Optometry

Citation: 139 Cal.App.2d 78, 293 P.2d 148

Opinion Judge: [10] Fox

Party Name: Mast v. State Board of Optometry

Attorney: [7] Gomer & Himmelfarb, Newell & Chester and Newell, Chester & Gibson for Appellant. [8] Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, and Edward M. Belasco, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondents.

Case Date: February 07, 1956

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

139 Cal.App.2d 78, 20721, Mast v. State Board of Optometry

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 17 Cal.2d 534, 17634, Webster v. Board of Dental Examiners
California - 21 Cal.2d 790, 16609, Dare v. Board of Medical Examiners
California - 35 Cal.2d 242, 21190, Cooper v. State Bd. of Medical Examiners
California - 45 Cal.2d 304, 19337, Bonham v. McConnell
California - 105 Cal.App.2d 239, 14668, Kendall v. Bd. of Osteopathic Examiners

See all quotations