139 Cal.App.2d 10, 16671, City & County of S. F. v. Budde

Citation: 139 Cal.App.2d 10, 292 P.2d 955

Opinion Judge: [10] Nourse

Party Name: City & County of S. F. v. Budde

Attorney: [7] Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, George E. Baglin and Patrick R. Kelly, Deputy City Attorneys, for Appellant. [8] Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, Miriam E. Wolff and Robert L. Berman, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondents.

Case Date: February 02, 1956

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

139 Cal.App.2d 10, 16671, City & County of S. F. v. Budde

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 23 Cal.2d 478, 5615, People ex rel. Happell v. Sischo
California - 34 Cal.2d 614, 20835, Essick v. City of Los Angeles
California - 37 Cal.2d 609, 21918, Kessloff v. Pearson
California - 38 Cal.2d 707, 21607, Anderson v. Stansbury
California - 43 Cal.2d 201, 22535, Complete Serv. Bur. v. San Diego Med. Soc.

139 Cal.App.2d 10, 16671, City &amp; County of S. F. v. Budde

139 Cal.App.2d 10, 16671, City & County of S. F. v. Budde