138 S.E.2d 910 (Ga.App. 1964), 40831, Stein Steel & Supply Co. v. Briggs Mfg. Co.

Citation: 138 S.E.2d 910, 110 Ga.App. 489

Opinion Judge: EBERHARDT, Judge.

Party Name: STEIN STEEL & SUPPLY COMPANY v. BRIGGS MANUFACTURING COMPANY.

Attorney: (b) The breach of an exclusive distributorship agreement is not a consideration supporting an agreement that merchandise might be returned for credit unless the exclusive distributorship agreement itself is valid and binding., 2. A general demurrer to an amendment to a pleading may be filed at an...

Judge Panel: BELL, P. J., and JORDAN, J., concur.

Case Date: Tuesday September 29, 1964

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

138 S.E.2d 910 (Ga.App. 1964), 40831, Stein Steel & Supply Co. v. Briggs Mfg. Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 238 F.2d 123 (9th Cir. 1956), 14893, Beedy v. Washington Water Power Co.
Georgia - 153 S.E. 218 (Ga.App. 1930), 20139, Chappell v. F.A.D. Andrea, Inc.
Georgia - 48 S.E. 933 (Ga. 1904), Huggins v. Southeastern Lime & Cement Co.
Georgia - 53 S.E. 458 (Ga. 1906), Mountain City Mill Co. v. Cobb
Georgia - 106 S.E.2d 45 (Ga.App. 1958), 37150, Bigelow-sanford Carpet Co. v. Goodroe

See all quotations