138 S.E.2d 645 (S.C. 1964), 18265, Skinner v. Santoro

Citation: 138 S.E.2d 645, 245 S.C. 35

Opinion Judge: Per Curiam.

Party Name: Robert W. SKINNER, Appellant, v. Onofrio William SANTORO and V. B. Hook Vacuum and Cooling Company, Inc., Respondents.

Attorney: Messrs. James P. Mozingo, III, and D. Kenneth Baker, of Darlington, for Appellant, cite: As to error on part of Trial Judge in finding that the Appellant had failed to show that the convenience of the witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by a change of venue: 228 S.C. 481, 90 S.E.2...

Case Date: October 27, 1964

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

138 S.E.2d 645 (S.C. 1964), 18265, Skinner v. Santoro

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 121 S.E.2d 13 (S.C. 1961), 17804, McMillan v. B. L. Montague Co.
South Carolina - 124 S.E.2d 912 (S.C. 1962), 17897, Basha v. Waccamaw Lumber & Supply Co.
South Carolina - 136 S.E.2d 711 (S.C. 1964), 18217, Harper v. Newark Ins. Co.
South Carolina - 63 S.E.2d 311 (S.C. 1951), 16461, Smith v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.