138 S.E.2d 277 (Ga. 1964), 22563, Reed v. Peeples

Citation: 138 S.E.2d 277, 220 Ga. 226

Opinion Judge: ALMAND, Justice.

Party Name: George REED v. I. M. PEEPLES.

Attorney: The trial court did not err in dismissing a motion for new trial because no complete brief of evidence had been presented to or approved by the court., Pittman & Kinney, H. E. Kinney, Dalton, for plaintiff in error., Mitchell & Mitchell, D. W. Mitchell, Jr., Dalton, Herman Spence, Blue Ridge, for...

Case Date: Friday September 11, 1964

Court: Georgia Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

138 S.E.2d 277 (Ga. 1964), 22563, Reed v. Peeples

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 16 S.E. 101 (Ga. 1892), Lamb v. State
Georgia - 16 S.E. 101 (Ga. 1892), Boatwright v. State
Georgia - 32 S.E. 106 (Ga. 1898), Eason v. Mayor, Etc., of Americus
Georgia - 33 S.E. 644 (Ga. 1899), Anderson v. Southern Ry. Co.
Georgia - 67 S.E. 813 (Ga. 1910), Wiggins v. Marietta Trust & Banking Co.

See all quotations