137 S.E.2d 61 (Ga.App. 1964), 40532, Wood v. Hamilton

Citation: 137 S.E.2d 61, 109 Ga.App. 608

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM.

Party Name: Pope T. WOOD v. Marie HAMILTON.

Attorney: show why the documentary evidence was rejected., Ham & Hampton, James G. Hampton, Forsyth, for plaintiff in error., John G. Davis, Clayton, for defendant in error., The protest was tried and the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the applicant. The protestant excepts to the trial court's judgmen...

Judge Panel: JORDAN and EBERHARDT, JJ., concur. Motion for rehearing denied. BELL, P. J., and JORDAN and EBERHARDT, JJ., concur.

Case Date: Tuesday April 07, 1964

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

137 S.E.2d 61 (Ga.App. 1964), 40532, Wood v. Hamilton

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 106 S.E. 274 (Ga. 1921), 2096, Moore v. McAfee
Georgia - 120 S.E. 31 (Ga.App. 1923), 14774, Dixon v. Sol Loeb Co.
Georgia - 158 S.E. 348 (Ga.App. 1931), 21193, Davis v. Peek
Georgia - 174 S.E. 194 (Ga.App. 1934), 23860, Cline v. State
Georgia - 174 S.E. 597 (Ga. 1934), 9871, Herndon v. State

See all quotations