136 S.E.2d 306 (S.C. 1964), 18211, Lail v. South Carolina State Highway Dept.

Citation: 136 S.E.2d 306, 244 S.C. 237

Opinion Judge: BUSSEY, Justice.

Party Name: Menta Lee LAIL, Respondent v. SOUTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT, Appellant.

Attorney: Messrs. Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General, and Benjamin B. Dunlap, Assistant Attorney General, of Columbia, and Suggs & McCutcheon, of Conway, for Appellant, cite: As to evidence being insufficient to establish that the Plaintiff's property was damaged by the acts of the Defendant, so as to cons...

Case Date: May 12, 1964

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

136 S.E.2d 306 (S.C. 1964), 18211, Lail v. South Carolina State Highway Dept.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 157 S.E. 842 (S.C. 1931), 13095, Chick Springs Water Co., Inc. v. State Highway Dept.
South Carolina - 187 S.E. 528 (S.C. 1936), 14347, Baynham v. State Highway Dept. of South Carolina
South Carolina - 121 S.E.2d 240 (S.C. 1961), 17824, Owens v. South Carolina State Highway Dept.
South Carolina - 136 S.E.2d 303 (S.C. 1964), 18212, Oshiek v. Oshiek
South Carolina - 8 S.E.2d 852 (S.C. 1940), 15080, Milhous v. State Highway Dept.

See all quotations