136 S.E.2d 298 (S.C. 1964), 18208, State v. Atkins

Citation: 136 S.E.2d 298, 244 S.C. 213

Opinion Judge: BRAILSFORD, Justice.

Party Name: The STATE, Respondent, v. James Albert ATKINS, Allen Craigo and Jimmy Maw, Appellants.

Attorney: Messrs. Rex L. Carter, William I. Bout on, Rodney A. Culbertson and James R. Mann, all of Greenville, for Appellants, cite: As to the evidence being insufficient to support the inference that the two Appellants, who purchased the liquor, knew that it was stolen property: 80 S.C. 387, 61 S.E. 1072...

Case Date: Wednesday May 06, 1964

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

136 S.E.2d 298 (S.C. 1964), 18208, State v. Atkins

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 120 S.E. 359 (S.C. 1923), 11369, State v. Cockfield
South Carolina - 117 S.E.2d 147 (S.C. 1960), 17714, State v. Graham
South Carolina - 134 S.E.2d 214 (S.C. 1963), 18147, Shell v. Brown
South Carolina - 32 S.E.2d 372 (S.C. 1944), 15694, State v. Atkins
South Carolina - 44 S.E.2d 741 (S.C. 1947), 16001, State v. White

See all quotations