136 N.W. 634 (Wis. 1912), Ketchum v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co.
Citation:
136 N.W. 634, 150 Wis. 211
Opinion Judge:
SIEBECKER, J.
Party Name:
KETCHUM, Appellant, v. CHICAGO, ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & OMAHA RAILWAY COMPANY, Respondent
Attorney:
For the appellant there was a brief by Samuel A. Anderson and W. H. Stafford, and oral argument by Mr. Anderson. For the respondent there was a brief by Jas. B. Sheean and Bundy & Wilcox, and oral argument by R. P. Wilcox. C. H. Van Alstine, as a friend of the court, also filed a brief and argued...
Judge Panel:
ROBERT G. SIEBECKER, J. WILLIAM H. TIMLIN, J., concurred and dissented in part. TIMLIN TIMLIN TIMLIN, J. I concur in the construction given to sec. 1816, Stats. (Laws of 1907, ch. 254). But I think a new trial should have been granted on account of misconduct of the jury. I am afraid of this case...
