135 S.E.2d 428 (Ga. 1964), 22282, Adams v. Adams

Citation: 135 S.E.2d 428, 219 Ga. 633

Opinion Judge: HEAD, Presiding Justice.

Party Name: Corrie Mae ADAMS v. Guy H. ADAMS.

Attorney: The Act of 1962 (Ga.L.1962, pp. 713-715) is not subject to the attacks made upon it, and it was not error to overrule the motion to strike., James E. Hardy, Atlanta, for plaintiff in error., Howard & Storey, James C. Howard, Jr., Atlanta, for defendant in error. James E. Hardy, Atlanta, for plai...

Case Date: Thursday February 06, 1964

Court: Georgia Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

135 S.E.2d 428 (Ga. 1964), 22282, Adams v. Adams

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 57 S.E. 326 (Ga. 1907), Dickerson v. Bowen
Georgia - 68 S.E. 734 (Ga. 1910), Ross v. Lettice
Georgia - 102 S.E.2d 534 (Ga. 1958), 19941, Perry v. Perry
Georgia - 102 S.E.2d 566 (Ga. 1958), 19925, Adams v. Adams
Georgia - 108 S.E.2d 872 (Ga. 1959), 20422, Murphey v. Murphey

See all quotations