135 S.E.2d 418 (Ga. 1964), 22212, Wright v. Lail

Citation: 135 S.E.2d 418, 219 Ga. 607

Opinion Judge: QUILLIAN, Justice.

Party Name: Joe WRIGHT v. Richard LAIL.

Attorney: [219 Ga. 610] Allen, Duncan & Ford, Reed, Ingram, Flournoy & Custer, Marietta, for plaintiff in error. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Warner R. Wilson, Jr., Frank Love, Jr., Atlanta, for defendant in error.

Case Date: Thursday February 06, 1964

Court: Georgia Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

135 S.E.2d 418 (Ga. 1964), 22212, Wright v. Lail

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 105 S.E. 386 (Ga.App. 1920), 11611, Rome Ry. & Light Co. v. Duke
Georgia - 118 S.E. 53 (Ga. 1923), 3380, Southern Ry. Co. v. Ray
Georgia - 134 S.E. 824 (Ga.App. 1926), 16859, Southern Ry. Co. v. Bottoms
Georgia - 144 S.E. 11 (Ga.App. 1928), 18883, City of Manchester v. Beavers
Georgia - 15 S.E. 825 (Ga. 1891), Atlanta St. R. Co. v. Jacobs

See all quotations