135 S.E.2d 229 (S.C. 1964), 18177, Grey v. Vaigneur

Citation: 135 S.E.2d 229, 243 S.C. 604

Opinion Judge: LEWIS, Justice.

Party Name: M. F. GREY, Appellant, v. Marvin VAIGNEUR, Thomas H. Woods, Wallace E. Goethe, L. J. Thomas, and Rance J. Smith, together constituting the County Board of Commissioners of Jasper County, and Daniel R. McLeod, as Attorney General for The State of South Carolina, Respondents.

Attorney: Luke N. Brown, Jr., Esq., of Ridgeland, for Appellant, cites: As to Act No. 570 of 1963 being unconstitutional for the reason that the purpose for which the proceeds of the bonds are to be expended is not a corporate purpose of Jasper County and the Act is therefore violative of Section 5 of Arti...

Case Date: Monday March 09, 1964

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

135 S.E.2d 229 (S.C. 1964), 18177, Grey v. Vaigneur

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 135 S.E. 538 (S.C. 1926), 12084, Evans v. Beattie
South Carolina - 148 S.E. 726 (S.C. 1929), 12682, Shelor v. Pace
South Carolina - 44 S.E. 938 (S.C. 1903), Allen v. Adams
South Carolina - 135 S.E.2d 225 (S.C. 1964), 18178, State v. Hennett
South Carolina - 32 S.E.2d 14 (S.C. 1944), 15691, Parrott v. Gourdin

See all quotations