135 A.2d 329 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1957), No. A--285, Hankin v. Board of Education of Hamilton Township

Citation: 135 A.2d 329, 47 N.J.Super. 70

Opinion Judge: Freund, J.A.D.

Party Name: WALTER B. HANKIN, NED R. STULL AND THOMAS M. BACKES, PARTNERS, t/a HANKIN, STULL & BACKES, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF HAMILTON TOWNSHIP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

Attorney: Mr. William Henry Lawton argued the cause for defendant-appellant. Mr. James A. Waldron argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents (Messrs. Backes & Backes, attorneys; Mr. Robert M. Backes, on the brief).

Judge Panel: Goldmann, Freund and Conford.

Case Date: October 14, 1957

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

135 A.2d 329 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1957), No. A--285, Hankin v. Board of Education of Hamilton Township

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Jersey - 170 A. 598 (N.J.L. 1934), 4, Sleight v. Board of Education of Paterson
New Jersey - 126 A.2d 372 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1956), No. A--359, Jardine Estates, Inc. v. Donna Brook Corp.
New Jersey - 46 A.2d 425 (N.J.L. 1946), 6, City Affairs Committee of Jersey City v. Board of Commissioners of City of Jersey City
New Jersey - 80 A.2d 433 (N.J. 1951), A-109, Rowland v. County of Hudson
New Jersey - 93 A.2d 195 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1952), No. A--728, Dial Press, Inc. v. Phillips

See all quotations