134 S.W.2d 262 (Tex.Crim.App. 1939), 20529, Brickell v. State

Citation: 134 S.W.2d 262, 138 Tex.Crim. 101

Opinion Judge: KRUEGER, Judge. PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM.

Party Name: BRICKELL v. STATE.

Attorney: Raymond Wilson and Henry R. Bishop, both of Fort Worth, for appellant. [138 Tex.Crim. 102] Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Atty., of Austin, and [138 Tex.Crim. 101] Marvin H. Brown, Jr., Crim. Dist. Atty., and Dayton Moses, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty., both of Fort [138 Tex.Crim. 102] Worth, for the State.

Case Date: November 08, 1939

Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

134 S.W.2d 262 (Tex.Crim.App. 1939), 20529, Brickell v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Texas - 112 S.W.2d 733 (Tex.Crim.App. 1938), 19328, Kibbe v. State
Texas - 134 S.W.2d 287 (Tex.Crim.App. 1939), 20568, Carrizal v. State
Texas - 25 S.W.2d 345 (Tex.Crim.App. 1929), 12854, Carroll v. State
Texas - 32 S.W.2d 197 (Tex.Crim.App. 1930), 13600, Smart v. State
Texas - 71 S.W.2d 871 (Tex.Crim.App. 1934), 16591, Galloway v. State