134 S.E. 925 (Ga.App. 1926), 17353, Chan v. Judge

Citation: 134 S.E. 925, 36 Ga.App. 13

Opinion Judge: BLOODWORTH, J.

Party Name: CHAN v. JUDGE.

Attorney: Odom & Tuten, of Savannah, for plaintiff in error. Wm. M. Farr, of Savannah, for defendant in error.

Judge Panel: BROYLES, C.J., and LUKE, J., concur.

Case Date: Tuesday October 05, 1926

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals