134 Cal.App.3d 999, 63443, Margolin v. Regional Planning Com.

Citation: 134 Cal.App.3d 999, 185 Cal.Rptr. 145

Opinion Judge: [11] Luros

Party Name: Margolin v. Regional Planning Com.

Attorney: [7] John H. Larson, County Counsel, S. Robert Ambrose and Judith A. Fries, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Carlyle W. Hall, Jr., Fredric D. Woocher, Michael S. Gendler and Alletta d'A. Belin for Plaintiffs and Respondents. [9] George Deukmejian, Attorney General, and Ted...

Case Date: July 22, 1982

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

134 Cal.App.3d 999, 63443, Margolin v. Regional Planning Com.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 641 F.2d 880 (D.C. Cir. 1980), 77-1351, Copeland v. Marshall
California - 20 Cal.3d 25, 30398, Serrano v. Priest
California - 43 Cal.App.2d 685, 12685, Lady v. Barrett
California - 111 Cal.App.3d 215, 18815, Fed-Mart Corp. v. Pell Enterprises, Inc.
California - 90 Cal.App.3d 140, 9206, People v. Byers

See all quotations