132 So.2d 21 (Fla.App. 3 Dist. 1961), 60-607, State for Use and Benefit of Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Clutter Const. Corp.

Citation: 132 So.2d 21

Opinion Judge: Author: Horton

Party Name: STATE of Florida, for the use and benefit of WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation, doing business as Westinghouse Electric Supply Company, Appellant, v. CLUTTER CONSTRUCTION CORP., a Florida corporation, and The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, an Ohio corporation, Appellees.

Attorney: Myers, Heiman & Kaplan, Miami, for appellant.

Case Date: Thursday July 06, 1961

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

132 So.2d 21 (Fla.App. 3 Dist. 1961), 60-607, State for Use and Benefit of Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Clutter Const. Corp.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 68 F.2d 445 (5th Cir. 1934), 7019, Republic Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co.
Florida - 43 So.2d 335 (Fla. 1949), Lehigh Structural Steel Co. v. Joseph Langner, Inc.
Missouri - 72 S.W.2d 191 (Mo.App. 1934), City of Springfield, for Use and Benefit of Horton v. Koch
Florida - 109 So. 644 (Fla. 1926), Fulghum v. State
Florida - 120 So. 556 (Fla. 1929), Kidd v. City of Jacksonville

See all quotations