132 S.E.2d 833 (Ga.App. 1963), 40300, Addison v. Southern Ry. Co.

Citation: 132 S.E.2d 833, 108 Ga.App. 314

Party Name: W. E. ADDISON v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY.

Attorney: A recovery on a quantum meruit basis may not be obtained where the services are rendered with no anticipation that compensation is to be received., William E. Addison filed suit against Southern Railway Company to recover under an alleged implied contract for services rendered. After an amendment...

Case Date: Monday September 16, 1963

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

132 S.E.2d 833 (Ga.App. 1963), 40300, Addison v. Southern Ry. Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 171 S.E. 162 (Ga.App. 1933), 22840, Brightwell v. Oglethorpe Tel. Co.
Georgia - 115 S.E.2d 374 (Ga.App. 1960), 38168, Studstill v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.
Georgia - 116 S.E.2d 252 (Ga.App. 1960), 38396, Mcgeeney v. Robertson
Georgia - 118 S.E.2d 193 (Ga.App. 1961), 38560, Scales v. Peevy
Georgia - 132 S.E.2d 813 (Ga.App. 1963), 40307, Mccann v. State