132 A.2d 70 (Conn. 1957), Attardo v. Connecticut Ry. & Lighting Co.

Citation: 132 A.2d 70, 144 Conn. 741

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM.

Party Name: Concetta ATTARDO v. CONNECTICUT RAILWAY AND LIGHTING COMPANY et al.

Attorney: Helen F. Krause, Bridgeport, for appellant (plaintiff)., J. Kenneth Bradley, Bridgeport, with whom, on the brief, was Henry J. Lyons, Bridgeport, for appellees (named defendant and others)., Joseph Weiner, New Haven, with whom, on the brief, was William Gitlitz, Milford, for appellee (defendant B...

Judge Panel: Before O'SULLIVAN, C.J., WYNNE, DALY and KING, JJ., and SWAIN, Superior Court Judge. Before O'SULLIVAN, C J, WYNNE, DALY and KING, JJ, and SWAIN, Superior Court

Case Date: Wednesday May 22, 1957

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

132 A.2d 70 (Conn. 1957), Attardo v. Connecticut Ry. & Lighting Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 181 A. 720 (Conn. 1935), Kulak v. Landers
Connecticut - 96 A. 169 (Conn. 1915), Roma v. Thames River Specialties Co.
Connecticut - 111 A.2d 555 (Conn. 1955), McKirdy v. Cascio
Connecticut - 51 A.2d 912 (Conn. 1947), Eamiello v. Piscitelli
Connecticut - 81 A.2d 682 (Conn. 1951), Ingraham v. Marotta