131 S.E.2d 778 (Ga.App. 1963), 40146, Day v. Phillips

Citation: 131 S.E.2d 778, 107 Ga.App. 824

Party Name: James H. DAY v. Mrs. Hazel PHILLIPS. James H. DAY v. Wilbert PHILLIPS.

Attorney: The evidence authorized the verdicts and no harmful error being shown by the amended motions for new trial the judgments overruling the defendant's motions for judgments non obstante veredicto or for new trials in the alternative were not error for any reasons assigned., Wilbert Phillips and his ...

Case Date: Thursday May 23, 1963

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

131 S.E.2d 778 (Ga.App. 1963), 40146, Day v. Phillips

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 70 Ga. 168 (Ga. 1883), Steed v. Cruise
Georgia - 103 S.E. 175 (Ga.App. 1920), 11097, Jones v. Stiles
Georgia - 98 S.E. 357 (Ga.App. 1919), 9650, Bowen v. J.J.O. Fuller & Son
Georgia - 100 S.E.2d 661 (Ga.App. 1957), 36863, Brewer v. Henson
Georgia - 100 S.E.2d 902 (Ga. 1957), 19883, Carmichael Tile Co. v. Mcclelland

See all quotations