131 S.E.2d 260 (S.C. 1963), 18076, Daniel v. Hazel

Citation: 131 S.E.2d 260, 242 S.C. 443

Opinion Judge: BUSSEY, Justice.

Party Name: Earl W. DANIEL, Appellant, v. Charles E. HAZEL, Respondent.

Attorney: Messrs. Traxler & Turner, of Greenville, for Appellant, cite: As to unwarranted attack on character of witness for Appellant being improper: 87 S.C. 183, 197 S.E. 683; 202 S.C. 244, 24 S.E.2d 369; 204 S.C. 374, 29 S.E.2d 488; 175 S.C. 30, 178 S.E. 261. As to rule that when the evidence admits of ...

Case Date: June 04, 1963

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

131 S.E.2d 260 (S.C. 1963), 18076, Daniel v. Hazel

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 118 S.E.2d 340 (S.C. 1961), 17742, Fuller v. Bailey
South Carolina - 119 S.E.2d 735 (S.C. 1961), 17777, State v. Jacobs
South Carolina - 123 S.E.2d 857 (S.C. 1962), 17871, Jumper v. Goodwin
South Carolina - 128 S.E.2d 98 (S.C. 1962), 17974, State v. Homewood
South Carolina - 29 S.E.2d 488 (S.C. 1944), 15633, Gantt v. Columbia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

See all quotations