131 S.E.2d 149 (Ga.App. 1963), 40002, Carmichael v. Gonzalez

Citation: 131 S.E.2d 149, 107 Ga.App. 746

Party Name: C. W. CARMICHAEL, Jr. v. A. J. GONZALEZ.

Attorney: The provisions of the contract for the sale of real property are not so vague and indefinite as to render the contract void and unenforceable. Neither is the contract unilateral because it is conditioned upon the obtaining of a loan by the purchaser. It follows that the court erred in its judgmen...

Case Date: April 03, 1963

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

131 S.E.2d 149 (Ga.App. 1963), 40002, Carmichael v. Gonzalez

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 169 S.E. 28 (Ga. 1933), 9384, Baker v. Lilienthal
Georgia - 123 S.E.2d 686 (Ga.App. 1961), 39079, Davis v. Holt
Georgia - 131 S.E.2d 197 (Ga.App. 1963), 40013, Mckinney v. Brown
Georgia - 37 S.E.2d 213 (Ga.App. 1946), 31106, Brown v. White
Georgia - 88 S.E.2d 795 (Ga.App. 1955), 35623, Teague v. Adair Realty & Loan Co.