130 S.E.2d 760 (Ga.App. 1963), 40019, Higdon Grocery Co. v. Faircloth

Citation: 130 S.E.2d 760, 107 Ga.App. 558

Opinion Judge: RUSSELL, Judge.

Party Name: HIGDON GROCERY COMPANY et al. v. Ruth W. FAIRCLOTH.

Attorney: The evidence on the trial of this death action resulting from an intersection collision presents a jury question on the issues of both contributory and comparative negligence. It was not error to deny the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict after a verdict in favor of the plaintiff., ...

Judge Panel: FELTON, C. J., and EBERHARDT, J., concur.

Case Date: Tuesday April 02, 1963

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

130 S.E.2d 760 (Ga.App. 1963), 40019, Higdon Grocery Co. v. Faircloth

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 54 S.E. 76 (Ga. 1906), Georgia R. & Banking Co. v. Andrews
Georgia - 64 S.E. 302 (Ga.App. 1909), 1,660, Pacetti v. Central of Ga. Ry. Co.
Georgia - 1 S.E.2d 601 (Ga.App. 1939), 27286, Brown v. O'Neal
Georgia - 105 S.E.2d 361 (Ga.App. 1958), 37288, Epps v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co.
Georgia - 126 S.E.2d 296 (Ga.App. 1962), 39487, Johns v. Secress

See all quotations