129 S.E. 493 (Va. 1925), Riggsby v. Tritton

Citation: 129 S.E. 493, 143 Va. 903

Opinion Judge: HOLT, J.

Party Name: H. E. RIGGSBY v. Helen Parrish TRITTON, et al.

Attorney: Williams & Mullen and Guy B. Hazelgrove, for the plaintiff in error. Jas. R. Sheppard, Jr., and Elsworth Wiltshire, for the defendants in error.

Judge Panel: Absent, Christian, J.

Case Date: Thursday October 01, 1925

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

129 S.E. 493 (Va. 1925), Riggsby v. Tritton

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 228 U.S. 233 (1913), 60, Sweeney v. Erving
California - 167 Cal. 245, L. A. 3070, Housel v. Pacific Electric Railway Company (A Corporation)
California - 191 Cal. 341, L. A. 7258, Scarborough v. M. Urgo
Indiana - 124 N.E. 510 (Ind.App. 1919), 10,082, Union Traction Company of Indiana v. Mann
Massachusetts - 220 Mass. 414 (1915), Stangy v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co.

See all quotations