127 S.E.2d 26 (Ga.App. 1962), 39568, Burns Brick Co. v. Adams

Citation: 127 S.E.2d 26, 106 Ga.App. 416

Party Name: BURNS BRICK COMPANY v. E. A. ADAMS.

Attorney: 2(a, b, c, e). These special grounds are without merit., (d) Evidence of universal custom and practice of a particular trade was not admissible to interpret the express and unambiguous terms of an oral contract., E. A. Adams, d/b/a Adams Clay Products Company of Nashville, Tennessee, sued Burns B...

Case Date: July 06, 1962

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

127 S.E.2d 26 (Ga.App. 1962), 39568, Burns Brick Co. v. Adams

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 127 S.E. 892 (Ga.App. 1925), 15871, Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Blount
Georgia - 170 S.E. 711 (Ga.App. 1933), 22865, Manley v. Exposition Cotton Mills
Georgia - 35 S.E. 342 (Ga. 1900), Haupt v. Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. Co.
Georgia - 125 S.E.2d 656 (Ga.App. 1962), 39258, Dillard v. Jackson's Atlanta Ready Mix Concrete Co.
Georgia - 125 S.E.2d 893 (Ga.App. 1962), 39274, State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Rogers

See all quotations