127 Cal.App.2d 263, 15916, Maclean v. City & County of S. F.

Citation: 127 Cal.App.2d 263, 273 P.2d 698

Opinion Judge: [13] Bray

Party Name: Maclean v. City & County of S. F.

Attorney: [7] Fitz-Gerald Ames, Sr., and Harold A. Galloway for Appellant. [8] Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, and George E. Baglin, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondent City and County of San Francisco. [9] Alexander, Bacon & Mundhenk for Respondents Barsotti and Bernardini. [10] Dana, Bledsoe & Smith and Wi...

Case Date: Friday August 27, 1954

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

127 Cal.App.2d 263, 15916, Maclean v. City & County of S. F.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 102 Cal. 220, 14922, Colgrove v. Smith
California - 122 Cal. 400, S. F. 851, Frassi v. McDonald
California - 156 Cal. 162, L. A. 2,276, Luce v. Holloway
California - 170 Cal. 589, L. A. 3470, Schmidlin v. Alta Planing Mill Co.
California - 182 Cal. 93, S. F. 8739, Boa v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Railways

See all quotations

127 Cal.App.2d 263, 15916, Maclean v. City &amp; County of S. F.

127 Cal.App.2d 263, 15916, Maclean v. City & County of S. F.