126 Cal.App.3d 603, 61648, Iram Enterprises v. Veditz

Citation: 126 Cal.App.3d 603, 179 Cal.Rptr. 1

Opinion Judge: [10] Lillie

Party Name: Iram Enterprises v. Veditz

Attorney: [7] Cheong & Denove and Drew R. Antablin for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Hecht, Diamond & Greenfield and Roger Jon Diamond for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: November 16, 1981

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

126 Cal.App.3d 603, 61648, Iram Enterprises v. Veditz

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 12 Cal.3d 790, 30295, Javor v. State Board of Equalization
California - 13 Cal.3d 43, 30156, Bertero v. National General Corp.
California - 258 Cal.App.2d 505, 885, Gilbert v. Sacramento Unified School Dist.
California - 104 Cal.App.3d 811, 5050, Buford v. State of California
California - 110 Cal.App.3d 868, Civ. 44835, Ion Equipment Corp. v. Nelson

See all quotations