126 Cal.App.2d 220, 15830, Stegner v. Bahr & Ledoyen, Inc.

Citation: 126 Cal.App.2d 220, 272 P.2d 106

Opinion Judge: [10] Wood

Party Name: Stegner v. Bahr & Ledoyen, Inc.

Attorney: [7] Howe & Finch for Appellants. [8] Costello & Johnson, Costello, Johnson & Rodgers, McDougall & Fairfax, Kenneth R. McDougall and Norman C. Howard for Respondents.

Case Date: Thursday June 24, 1954

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

126 Cal.App.2d 220, 15830, Stegner v. Bahr & Ledoyen, Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 150 Cal. 592, L. A. 1676, Williams v. Los Angeles Railway Company
California - 180 Cal. 331, L. A. 4903, Strong v. Sullivan
California - 206 Cal. 669, L. A. 9095, Perrin v. Mountain View Mausoleum Association
California - 208 Cal. 29, L. A. 9533, Lane v. San Diego Electric Railway Company
California - 210 Cal. 288, L. A. 10526, Carter v. Chotiner

See all quotations

126 Cal.App.2d 220, 15830, Stegner v. Bahr &amp; Ledoyen, Inc.

126 Cal.App.2d 220, 15830, Stegner v. Bahr & Ledoyen, Inc.